🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, global health authorities raised concerns that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of corporate influence everywhere. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be lowered to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the legislation is approved.

International experts actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Further, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, they said, adding that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, noting that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which includes growing volumes of black market activity”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.